2 SapherCheck records found for Person Robert guiliano

1 Sanctions

Sanction Caption Reciprocal
Sanction Datasets US SAM Procurement Exclusions
Sanction First Seen 2024-10-10
Sanction Last Change 2024-10-10
Sanction Last Seen 2024-10-25
Sanction Properties Authority: USDA-AMS

Authority ID: S4MRTR2B2

Start Date: 2024-10-02
End Date: 2026-08-09
Listing Date: 2024-10-08
Country: United States

Entity: usgsa-s4mrtr2b2

Program: Reciprocal

Provisions: Ineligible (Proceedings Completed)

Source URL: https://sam.gov/data-services/Exclusions/Public%20V2?privacy=Public

Summary: Debarment was proposed because a USDA Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigation revealed that CAPELLAN, DIAZ, and GUILIANO engaged in a scheme whereby they purchased produce on credit from growers for resale but failed to remit payment. When growers and/or shipping companies pursued payment through email and/or phone and text messages, CAPELLAN, DIAZ, and GUILIANO ceased all communication. After a certain amount of time and claims made against a certain company name, CAPELLAN, DIAZ, and GUILIANO would “close” that company and open a new company under a new and “clean” name. As a result of the scheme, victims lost more than $973,000 in unpaid produce and shipping orders. For further information contact the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agency Exclusions POC.

1 Sanctions

Sanction Caption Reciprocal
Sanction Datasets US SAM Procurement Exclusions
Sanction First Seen 2024-10-10
Sanction Last Change 2024-10-10
Sanction Last Seen 2024-10-25
Sanction Properties Authority: USDA-AMS

Authority ID: S4MRTR2GL

Start Date: 2024-10-02
End Date: 2026-09-06
Listing Date: 2024-10-08
Country: United States

Entity: usgsa-s4mrtr2gl

Program: Reciprocal

Provisions: Ineligible (Proceedings Completed)

Source URL: https://sam.gov/data-services/Exclusions/Public%20V2?privacy=Public

Summary: Debarment was proposed because a USDA Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigation revealed that CAPELLAN, DIAZ, and GUILIANO engaged in a scheme whereby they purchased produce on credit from growers for resale but failed to remit payment. When growers and/or shipping companies pursued payment through email and/or phone and text messages, CAPELLAN, DIAZ, and GUILIANO ceased all communication. After a certain amount of time and claims made against a certain company name, CAPELLAN, DIAZ, and GUILIANO would “close” that company and open a new company under a new and “clean” name. As a result of the scheme, victims lost more than $973,000 in unpaid produce and shipping orders. For further information contact the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agency Exclusions POC.